| |
Demand
for
office space grows |
|
CB
Richard Ellis reports that vacancy rates for Denver office
space is dropping slowly
The fourth quarter of 2005 saw Denver’s
downtown office vacancy rate drop from 12.3 percent in the
third quarter to 11.9 percent. That level represents
a significant decrease in available office space from a year ago, when the vacancy
rate was 14.2 percent.
Vacancy rates for office space in suburban areas outside Denver are much higher,
with fourth quarter 2005 coming in at 16.9 percent, down 1.1 percent from the
preceding quarter and from the fourth quarter 2004 level of 18.4 percent.
Metropolitan vacancy rates are also dropping, with fourth quarter 2005 at 15.8
percent, down from 16.7 percent the quarter before and down significantly from
the fourth quarter 2004 level of 19.4 percent. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Office market shows
signs of recovering
Michael Perrault
Denver Business Journal
Most of metro Denver's office market continues its robust
recovery two months into 2006, with landlords ratcheting up rents as available
space tightens downtown, in Cherry Creek and in other areas
of
the city.
Some sectors, however, are lagging behind, with vacancy rates
edging upward. Others have negative absorption rates, prompting landlords
to offer more concessions or drop lease rates. For tenants
eyeing expansion or relocation into portions of Aurora and Denver, such
market stagnation can mean opportunities for better lease
deals.
In the southeast suburbs, which includes the Denver Tech Center
and Inverness Business Park, 1.2 million square feet of
space was absorbed last year, more than four times the absorption rate of
the next-closest sector, said Phillip Ruschmeyer, senior
managing director of Frederick Ross Co.'s commercial real estate services
division in Denver.
"In the southeast suburbs where you may have had 40 buildings that
had 40,000 square feet a year-and-a-half ago, you probably
only have 20 buildings right now," Ruschmeyer said. "So
we're doing a lot of leasing. There's a tenant looking
at taking the
entire IGC building."
The sprawling southeast suburban office sector boasts 29 million
square feet of space, about 22 percent of which is vacant.
While that vacancy rate is only down about 2.5 percentage points from
a year earlier, the figure is a little misleading, Ruschmeyer
said. The sector added almost 2.5 million square feet of new space last
year as single-tenant buildings were converted to multitenant
space.
In contrast, an area just to the north of the southeast suburbs
-- from Hampden Avenue north to about Sixth Avenue, and
from Broadway east to I-225 -- has lagged behind in its recovery. Of 8.6 million
square feet of office space in that sector, 2.4 million
square
feet remain vacant -- a 27.6 percent vacancy rate, according
to Frederick Ross Co.'s year-end report.
Class B buildings in that sector posted a negative absorption
rate of more than 180,000 square feet, bringing the vacancy rate to
33.3 percent, up from 29 percent last year.
The vacancy rate in the central business district, encompassing
23 million square feet in the heart of downtown, has dipped
to 16 percent, with a median leasing rate of $18 per square foot.
Brokerage CB Richard Ellis reported that the central business
district experienced the highest absorption of all sub-markets in Denver,
with a year-end total of 863,317 square feet. It's a trend
that helped spur a dozen building acquisitions last year in the area,
the company reported.
"The central business district appears to be tightening
up," said
Jim McGrath, senior vice president and branch manager of
commercial real estate services firm Studley in Denver. "Clearly, that's
the case with Class A space, especially any kind of space
that has decent western views. We were recently out in the market
with a 50,000-square-foot tenant, and I think we only found
five quality
options for them."
Good opportunities in Aurora
Todd Wheeler, executive director with Cushman & Wakefield
Inc., said the real activity and focus is in areas with
high demand and
where vacancy rates are plummeting. In more stagnant
office markets such as areas of Aurora, it's a different
story.
Some properties in Aurora are offering "phenomenal rent opportunities
and value," Wheeler said, although many big-block
properties have been absorbed, scarfed up by larger tenants
such as Northrup
Grumman and Corporate Express.
"It's really tough not to find a good opportunity in Aurora," Wheeler
said. "It's an interesting mixed bag."
Lower Downtown has a vacancy rate of about 8 percent
and high-rise product is commanding $6-to-$8-per-foot
pricing differences, and
the entire central business district is at about 16 percent,
according to year-end reports.
"As a result, LoDo has at least four new projects that are not just
on the drawing board but are going through approvals," Wheeler
said.
"There's clearly a lot of pent-up demand for new product in the
central business district, in LoDo or the Cherry Creek
market," Wheeler
said. "However, Cherry Creek's ability to absorb
larger blocks of space is very suspect."
At least part of the reason for all the activity downtown
is because it's populated with growing oil, finance,
insurance, real estate
and service companies, Ruschmeyer said. "Those industries
are doing well in the economy and, in turn, are doing well here," he
said. "If you look for a block of space in a Class A building
in the central business district, there's nothing over a couple
of floors," he said.
Frederick Ross Co. said the midtown area had overall
absorption of 116,171 square feet, and vacancy rates
declined more than 2
percentage points to 12.9 percent. The vacancy rate in
the Glendale subsector, on the other hand, with 2.3 million
total square feet,
climbed to 23.5 percent from 21.5 percent, and had negative
absorption of 44,877 square feet.
"The culprit was the Class B market and, within it, the Galleria
North and South buildings," Ruschmeyer said.
Northwest No. 2 in absorption
The northwest sector has improved, achieving the second-highest
absorption rate at just under 350,000 square feet last
year, with vacancy rates at 24.7 percent, commercial
brokers said. The area
could get a boost from the high-tech sector this year,
and 75 percent of leases in the sector will roll over
in the next 27 months, according
to a year-end report by Jones Lang LaSalle.
The northeast sector suffered a modest setback with absorption
negative at just over 35,000 square feet, Frederick Ross
Co. reported. Its vacancy rates increased more than 2
points, to 17 percent from
14.6 percent.
Often, a matter of seven or eight blocks can make a big
difference in both perception and rental rates.
"Look at a submarket like Cherry Creek, where demand for space north
of the mall has been strong despite congestion and parking
hassles," Wheeler
said. "Those buildings are getting premiums of $2
to $8 over buildings of comparable quality east of the
mall, only eight
or
nine blocks away.
"There are big spreads in rental [rates] from one submarket to another,
really depending on the demand that occurs in that given
market," he
said.
Many rental increases have more to do with recent building
acquisitions, commercial brokers said.
"There's so much capital that's chasing real estate, that sale prices
are increasing, capitalization rates are decreasing and
the only way building owners can achieve a decent return is to increase
rental rates, decrease concession packages or both," McGrath
said.
In a recent deal, for instance, Brookfield Properties
sold the 28-story World Trade Center I and 29-story World
Trade Center II
buildings at 16th and Broadway to Chicago-based Transwestern
Commercial Services and Palo Alto, Calif.-based Broadreach
Capital.
"I think rates have gone up in those buildings by a dollar or two
a foot since the sale," McGrath said.
For tenants shopping for Class B or B-minus properties,
there are good deals if companies can take into account
challenges such as
insufficient parking and floor designs or inadequate
HVAC and electrical systems.
As tenants considering an expansion or move eye all the
options, McGrath suggests they think strategically and
give themselves enough
time to consider myriad factors.
"Ideally, a tenant should think through issues such as projected
headcount, location, image, business unit adequacy and
budget prior to looking at office space," McGrath said. "Too
many tenants treat office space as a commodity. Unfortunately,
ill-conceived
space can have an adverse impact on your business that
could cost much more money in the long run than the actual
cost of
the space
itself."
McGrath, Ruschmeyer, Wheeler and other commercial brokers
said clients' internal expansion is driving much of the
market growth,
although there's increasing interest from prospective
new tenants. Cushman & Wakefield is seeing companies
from California and the East Coast, Wheeler said.
"We've got a 100,000-square-foot national company taking
a hard look at a building we've got in the 'burbs, and another
50,000-square-foot out-of-state-company looking, and that'snot all that common," Ruschmeyer
said.
|
|
|
|
|
Top
25 Tallest
Buildings in Denver
|
|
| |
name |
height |
year built |
| 1 |
Republic Plaza |
218 m |
1984 |
| 2 |
1801 California Street |
216 m |
1983 |
| 3 |
Wells Fargo Center |
213 m |
1983 |
| 4 |
1999 Broadway |
166 m |
1985 |
| 5 |
707
17th Street |
159 m |
1981 |
| 6 |
555 17th Street |
155 m |
1978 |
| 7 |
Hyatt Regency Denver |
149 m |
2005 |
| 8 |
1670 Broadway |
137 m |
1980 |
| 9 |
17th Street Plaza |
134 m |
1982 |
| 10 |
First Interstate Tower |
132 m |
1974 |
| 11 |
Brooks Towers |
128 m |
1968 |
| 12 |
Denver Place South Tower |
127 m |
1981 |
| 13 |
One Tabor Center |
124 m |
1984 |
| 14 |
Johns Manville Plaza |
123 m |
1978 |
| 15 |
Plaza Tower |
121 m |
1983 |
| 16 |
Embassy Suites Downtown |
119 m |
1983 |
| 17 |
US Bank Tower |
119 m |
1975 |
| 18 |
621 17th Street |
117 m |
1957 |
| 19 |
1600 Glenarm Place |
117 m |
1967 |
| 20 |
Denver
Financial Center |
114 m |
1981 |
| 21 |
Dominion
Plaza South |
112
m |
1982 |
| 22 |
Lincoln
Center |
112
m |
1972 |
| 23 |
Bank
One Tower |
111
m |
1980 |
| 24 |
Matrix
Financial Center |
109
m |
1961 |
| 25 |
World
Trade Center II |
109
m |
1980 |
|
|